Three Methods of Determining Reasonable Compensation Part II: The Market Approach


There are three generally accepted methods for determining Reasonable Compensation for the owner of a closely-held business. It is important to match each method with the business’s size and business owner’s job duties.

  1. The Cost approach, aka many hats, approach: Generally works best for small businesses where the owner wears multiple hats.
  2. The Market approach, aka the industry comparison approach: Generally works best for Closely-held SMB’s where the owner performs predominantly managerial tasks.
  3. The Income approach, aka the independent investors’ test: Generally works best for outliers.

This month we explore the Market approach for determining Reasonable Compensation for a closely-held business owner. The Market approach attempts to answer the question:  How much compensation would be paid for the same position, held by a non-owner in an arms-length employment relationship at a similar company.

Frequently, the approaches for determining Reasonable compensation for a business owner are compared to the approaches used to value real estate. The market approach for appraising a home is most effective when used in track neighborhoods. The appraiser would run a search for three or four homes that have sold within the last year, that were in the same neighborhood, and had a similar floor plan to the home he/she was appraising. He/she would then make adjustments based on differences in square footage, garage spaces, etc. to determine the value of the home.

The Market approach (aka the Industry Comparison Approach) for determining Reasonable Compensation for closely held SMB’s is very similar. This approach seeks to determine the owner’s compensation by analyzing the compensation of employees in businesses of similar size and from the same industry (the same neighborhood).  The market approach focuses strongly on the owner’s business type and the specific position held by the owner: typically CEO or General Manager.  This approach then compares both the business type and the position of the owner to that of its peers to draw a conclusion for what Reasonable Compensation should be.

The market approach works well when only one occupation, (usually upper-management), is being compared to peers in the same industry, with similar company size and geographic area.  Because of this, the market approach is favored when working with big-small companies (jumbo shrimp), and medium-sized closely-held businesses, where the owner is wearing only one hat: that of a general manager or chief executive.


Market Approach results generally include local (if available), state, and national wage data.  The theory: big-small businesses and medium business can pull from a larger area and attract candidates from around the state and/or country.

Reasonable Compensation Horror Story: A Realtor Haunted By Missing Reasonable Compensation Calculations and Payroll Non-Compliance

As many of us in the tax and accounting profession know, there’s rarely much good that can come out of the IRS flagging a business owner’s personal tax return for…
Court Cases & True Stories October 31, 2023

Rising and Falling Revenue: The Keys to Reasonable Compensation Calculations for Real Estate Agents

You may think it’s a challenge to calculate reasonable compensation for real estate agents due to fluctuations in the economy.
Best Practices October 23, 2023

Start exploring RCReports today.

        Submit a Ticket

          Scroll to Top